Thanks for the warning!

I find it sad that a whole article can be dismissed due to where it is published. By itself, it is completely fine and blasts already open doors to the HN crowd, but I like its concise wording and how it phrases some points, like the one about GMail.

Though it is quite interesting that such a privacy stance on "I have nothing to hide" comes in an allegedly neo-nazi paper, knowing this is the mindset that led so many people to be tracked by nazis. People knowingly went to nazi census. I find it quite ironic.

EDIT: verbatim copy of https://www.ludlowinstitute.org/articles/what-i-wish-i-knew-.... @dang perhaps?

Thanks for sharing information on another portfolio company owned by the publisher of this article, i.e. two degrees of corporate separation. Are there public tools which can provide ownership and portfolio analysis about any article URL? Do you have any feedback on the privacy-focused content of this specific article?

For social network analysis of article metadata as a proxy for article content quality, the author is founder of Ludlow Institute in United States, whose board of advisors includes, https://www.ludlowinstitute.org/about

  Phil Zimmermann, PGP creator
  Christine L. Petersen, coined the term "open source"
  Perry Metzger, Cryptography mailing list creator

[dead]