• > if (const auto& [is_successful, error_message] = foo(n))

    I don't like it. It's hard to reason what exactly serves as condition variable.

    • Should probably make it explicit in this case, something like: if (const auto& [is_successful, error_message] = foo(n); is_successful)

      In a more normal scenario you'd expect to use std::expected here rather than a custom struct with an operator bool.

    • The return value of foo(n), converted to bool, acts as the condition variable…