- I get 401 errors all three time, because I use web browsers that don't leak enough personally identifiable information to prove that I'm not a robot.
- I doubt you are regularly getting 401s because of this.
- You don’t need PII to prove you are not a robot. See Privacy Pass. And I don’t know how a website is somehow going to verify your PII as not-fake, anyway.
Likely you just use a shit web browser.
- How a website is going to identify your PI as non-fake? Isn't that the entire business model behind Persona which has been in the news for leaks? (There are a few websites I've had to verify my if I with them for)
- the way to pass captcha as a bot is to pay off the company that makes the captcha by using their bot.
cloudflare browser run, superb. no captcha.
- i have privacy pass and i really can't make it work.
every time there is a captcha it makes you authenticate. so it's the same thing as the captcha.
maybe i have it misconfigured
- When I was first poking around with Tor, I wondered how many of the "Get guns in Europe", "Hard Drugs here", "Credit Card Numbers for sale" and such links were honeypots. Luckily, not being interested in any of those things, I didn't have to find out.
- If they use surveillance coins like BTC they are 100% a honeypot/scam.
- Most of the legit stuff was on telegram, surprisingly or not. I know people who bought uh firearms and more there. Unfortunately, it feels like it disappeared at the same time as the proximity feature
- [flagged]
- WTF is the "planned shooting" you casually dropped here?
- I assume its a misstranslation, basically somebody trying to go to the shooting range with friends?
- I doubt that it is the case. The registration of the gun is a part of the process everywhere afaik.
- Oh, nothing special, just a run-of-the-mill school shooting he wanted to do at some point.
- i was beginning to wonder if this is the new world we're living in now where such things are casually discussed
- You, uh, OK now?
- Nit. Isn't it a real honeypot, not a fake one?
- I assume the word is in there for the sake of people who don't know what a honeypot is. It gets them curious that law enforcement set up something fake, even if they don't immediately know what it is for.
- It's a fake honeypot, you investigate it to see how it's done and they send guns and drugs to your house instead.
- > Nit. Isn't it a real honeypot, not a fake one?
The lack of even taking your payment details makes it look either fake, as in still being built or built as a demo, or not being a serious operation.
- Yes, this surprised me as well. Credit card and Paypal information should give the police everything they need to identify the criminal (in a way that's much more simple and reliable than via IP address, which may be obfuscated via a VPN or similar). Why not take it, it's free?
- fake real one
- Oh I think I did something similar by chance. I was seeing which websites were associated with some entities, and I found the ones of the Italian defense ministry. In italian defense is "difesa". I found one that had "bifesa" in the link, and when opened told me that I had to be more careful to links I open because it could have been a dangerous website. Flash forward to a year later and it didn't work anymore
- Sounds like something used by phishing awareness training. If so, then presumably it didn’t work anymore because they ended that or use a different one.
- Yes I think they might have changed it
- Is a fake honeypot ... real?
Is een nep-honeypot ... echt?
Forgive my pedantry.
- Why is this particular phrasing; "fake honeypot" triggering déjà vu for me? And is it fake déjà vu or legit?
Genuinely asking if anyone recalls this being in an HN in the last two yearsish.
- HN search is fantastic, it doesn't look like it. https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&qu...
- [dead]
- "I guess they saw my email address that greeted them. They probably received logs of someone "falling for it", and saw someone was poking around their secret website, and knew who was behind it. They completely panicked."
I doubt it. I think the author of this page is giving himself way too much credit. The only evidence that anyone "panicked" is the author's own statements that they must have. More likely someone put in a WAF rule that 401'd for his IP.
"By running these honeypots, the police create suspicion and paranoia in the community. If you want to buy a DDoS attack, you now have to wonder if the website is real or just a police honeypot logging your IP. They want people to stop trusting these services entirely."
Well, good, right? What "community" is this diabolical suspicion and paranoia being created in? The community kids who want to DDoS some other kids' game servers? OK, again, that's good, right?
"But it really just feels more like feds jerking themselves off on how cool they are."
Pot, kettle.
"Does this video and the honeypot have any real impact? Let's be honest: probably not."
How does the author know? According to Wikipedia, the larger operation has shut down 4 dozen sites offering DDoS services.
Sure, gov't is often clueless and maybe this is effective or maybe it isn't. Maybe it's an experiment. Maybe it's actually intercepted a fair number of potential customers.
If clueless teens are signing up for booters and it's actually LEO who contacts them and says "you know, that's illegal" then that's a good thing.
- >More likely someone put in a WAF rule that 401'd for his IP.
Why make this assumption when you could just visit the website yourself and see the same 401?
- I visited and got the 401 but that doesn't mean whatever triggered it isn't automated.
The reasonable assumption to make when something changes that it had nothing to do with me. Because 99.99999% of the time, it didn't.
- I dunno, if they got ID #15, and the site shut down immediately after (for everyone), it doesn’t seem like a crazy stretch.
Like, if a page gets hundreds of thousands of visitors, then your assumption is reasonable. For a page that might get dozens of visitors over its lifetime, it’s a much less certain assumption
- It's unlikely in my opinion as someone that maintains a lot of websites, because it's long odds that I'm even at my desk at any given time, let alone monitoring and panicking over what visitors are clicking on.
Is it possible that it happened that way? Sure. But it's more likely that it didn't.
- Do you run any honeypots? You realise the point of a honeypot is, unlike a normal website, to monitor exactly what visitors are clicking on so the trapper can react?
- They were supposed to shut down after #12 but they got busy, then had to take that day off to get the kids to the doctor and it fell to the wayside. Eventually, the notification for #15 arrived and the dev panicked that it should have gone down weeks ago.
- [flagged]
- Why would they have Cloudflare turnstiles? Are they worried about getting DDOS-ed?
- Cloudflare have successfully made their products so common people use them without giving a second thought to whether or not it makes sense
- Coming back to point out cloudflare is probably the most common way of hiding your servers ip if you are running a greyzone or illegal service, and its useful for running many websites on the same VPS without reverse DNS busting you
- DDOS websites get DDOSed by their competitors all the time
- Stress testing your own site like the article shows isn't criminal intent. There is legitimate market demand to understand if a service you are running can properly withstand and filter out either large mounts of legitimate and illegitimate traffic.
- Wouldn't a legitimate service for stress testing your own site ask for proof that you own the site?
- I mean what makes a ddos service legitimate? Plus security is an endless cat and mouse game and asking the cat what the best way to catch a mouse is may not reveal the same information as asking the mouse how they evade the cat.
- There might be too much friction to get someone working for a site to be able to prove it which will reduce sales. It's simpler to just use the legal system to enforce it by putting it in the terms of service.
- Technically it would classify as a real honeypot site I'd think
- > Does this video and the honeypot have any real impact? Let's be honest: probably not. It feels like they are just redistributing wealth from the average taxpayer to AI video slop corporations.
I feel like this describes roughly 75% of all government initiatives.
- Of course not, it seems a rare thing that politicians are chose based on knowledge or merit. Spewing bullcrap, shitting money, kissing rings, those are all great ways to become a politician, but they are horrible ways to direct and manage policy and insulates those people from how the world actually functions. And the only punishment for doing an absolutely horrible job is they MIGHT have to find another job years down the road.
- >99% surely
- I was being polite LMAO
- One of those articles that has an interesting anecdote but written with a mundane lulz mentality. If it’s for teenagers, by teenagers. All is well.
- I'm not a teenager anymore but I thoroughly enjoyed it, a lot better than some random dev breathlessly talking about how they haven't written a line of code in 6 months, or an article talking about how LLMs lead to the end of programming/the economy/the world, etc etc.
- It’s a little shitposty but i had fun.
I, too, hate it when people discuss hacking on my Claude News homepage.
- I know. This was not a helpful comment. Sorry.
125 points by fishgoesblub 14 hours ago | 56 comments