• k310
    This from the party of "no interference with business".

    It's obviously a means to take control of AI, because the security argument fails Bigly after the firing of top security experts in the government (who might have the "wrong" views" )

    Something about free speech being free for me but not for you?

    • Do you think AI should be unregulated?
      • Yes, if we're talking about running LLMs. It's just math.
        • I don’t want it regulated, but it’s not just math when training data can be manipulated to change what the math does.
        • yeah, in the way that knives are “just metal”

          you’re being so reductive you’ve made any discussion about it completely useless

      • If AI is going to be regulated those regulations should be debated in public and based upon the resulting laws passed by the legislative process and not determined by royal decree.
  • Timing around Anthropic valuation crossing OpenAI and getting ready for IPO ...
  • So this is going back to the spirit of what the Biden admin and the frontier labs wanted just recently?

    https://www.bis.gov/press-release/biden-harris-administratio...

    More regulated rather than unregulated (or very lightly regulated).

    Most people would probably say that’s a good thing, if I read the tea leaves correctly.

  • The Executive Order: https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2026/06/prom...

    IMO this isn't much more egregious than the "stop woke AI" executive order he signed in July 2025 which explicitly regulated the "ideology" of LLMs

    https://www.paulhastings.com/insights/client-alerts/presiden...

    • Yeah, the order itself seems like a fairly reasonable response to Mythos level capabilities. It does solve one problem of the frontier labs, which is safely coordinating releases without hitting antitrust regulations. It also makes a bigger moat for incumbents.
  • [dead]