• I live very close to LAX, and we have hundreds of Waymos in our area. At first i was a little weary, and kinda weirded out by all of them.

    They have become completely normal, and cause WAY fewer traffic incidents than human drivers. They are very predictable, and will always let you pull in front of them when changing lanes (unlike a lot of other LA drivers).

    I have seen a few incidents where they seem 'stuck', and it was a bit annoying and kind of funny, but again, it does not happen nearly as often as for human drivers.

    I also like taking them. It is nice to just get in and relax and not have to talk to anyone or worry about who is going to pick you up. You can control the temperature and music from your phone, you can drop the pin exactly where you want to be dropped off and picked up, and the ride is smooth and comfortable.

    We can debate all the knock on effects of Waymos, but the user experience is pretty great.

  • Surprisingly low hype for a company running perhaps the most advanced consumer-interactive robots. I’m quite fond of these machines and will periodically rescue them when someone has misused them (door not closed, most commonly). Hope they do well. Very good road participants.
  • I am really wondering, how they tackle the long trail problem of unknown situations. Sure they are monitor them constantly but I am asking precisely, how to handle situations that occur ridiculously infrequently: do they sample them 1000x in sim? Or do they use a different model and track uncertainty in the model constantly? How to get another 0 between the dot and the percent sign in situations where the model makes the wrong choice with a significant probability?
  • Missed opportunity to say "Open to Y'all"
  • Here in Austin, I'm stuck calling an uber and hoping I get a Waymo. When does that deal expire?
  •   > Dallasites
    
    Is that seriously the demonym? Terrible. Try harder, Dallasites.
    • It sounds too much like "parasite" for me to be comfortable using it. I'm assuming some random person made it up. It's okay to just say "people of/from <place>", guys.
      • But then you lose extra important information from words like "masshole."
    • Having grown up in Dallas, I usually just say "Texan" and call it a day.
    • What's your better suggestion? Dallasonian? Dallaser? Dallasan?

      Also, do you have the same issue with the demonyms Manhattanite or Seattleite?

    • Dallmatians
    • better than "cityofhate" which is what we're called most of the time.
      • Understandable, I'd also hate to live in Dallas /s
    • Texas -> Texan Kansas - Kansan Honduras -> Honduran

      It should be Dallan?

    • Dallasians? Dallasers? Dallaslets?

      Dallards?

    • I thought it was a typo, or strange url at first.
    • I like North Texans
  • No freeways. But Waymo now is available to all of Dallas?

    Does that include the suburbs?

    • It's open to _everyone in Dallas_, not available _in all of Dallas_.
    • Why isn't downtown called the superurbs?
    • I believe they paused freeways everywhere because they drove through some construction (or didn't handle construction zones well).
    • Open to all people, not open to all roads.
    • looks like Bishop Arts -> Fair Park -> White Rock -> NW Hwy -> Hampton/Inwood, with a weird section jutting out toward Irving along 114

      so, no suburbs, only enclaves

      • our group sees them all the time while skating the katy trail and through downtown dallas
      • Thanks
  • Why are the cars so big? Wouldn't it make sense to have a bunch of much smaller, single person vehicles?
    • Tesla Cybercab has about three or four times the efficiency and like a fifth of the price by having smaller, two person vehicles. Indeed, the vast majority of trips are taken by single people and it's ridiculous to have a giant machine for them. It would also be okay to have a handful of larger, Model Y-sized vehicles for the multi-person trips.

      To actually answer your question: Part of the reason why the Waymo cars are so big is because they got a deal on buying all the Jaguar I-Pace vehicles, which checked several boxes:

      * Electric vehicles and hybrids are preferable for self driving cars as they have robust electrical power for the sensors and compute

      * Larger minivans or SUVs are preferable for both development work and early scaling up where you can't afford to have both smaller and larger vehicles

      * The I-Pace wasn't selling well so they managed to snag the whole production batch

      * Though Jaguar isn't exactly known for their great reliability and electrical systems, the I-Pace, manufactured by Magna Steyr, is actually decent

      The first two reasons are why the Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid, the only hybrid minivan sold in the US, was so popular for early self driving car efforts (including with Waymo) in the 2010s.

      That said, Waymo's Ojai is somewhat more space efficient than the older I-Pace. They also have the Ioniq 5 coming.

    • Why would it make more sense? It isn't like a car half the size would cost half as much, but it would severely limit the capacity. Now, you can get a waymo for 1-4 people, but if some (or all) were single occupant, you would be limited.

      Being smaller does not help that much much in cost per mile, but has a big cost for functionality.

    • I’m thinking that since 2015. Like BMW C1 just with doors on the side and a bit more security. This would approx allow 3-4x as many travellers on a given route compared to traditional cars.
      • A C1 with more security, meaning more material and air between you and a potential high-speed obstacle, is called a car and is sized like one.
    • SFC costs don’t scale linearly with volume or number of seats.

      The cameras, LIDAR, and sensors are all fixed costs. You need them on even a single-person car. And they’re extremely costly.

    • Americans are fat, they don't fit.
      • The All-American Retatrutide is (nearly) here to save us all thankfully.
  • Keeps on being rolled out in red states while being delayed in blue states, quite unfortunate.
    • Divide this differently:

      - states where the major cities commonly have snow for > 3 months

      - states where the major cities commonly have snow for < 1 month

      Inclement weather is likely the differentiator. Blue state California gets Waymo in its biggest cities, which handily do not get much snow. The other Waymo cities are all below the Mason-Dixon Line.

      • Blocked even from testing in NYC. Blocked from DC and Boston. Unfortunately this does have more to do with bad government than bad weather.
        • Boston, according to Waymo[1], is dependent on the legislature making autonomous vehicles legal. Apparently NY state laws also require a human driver at the wheel.

          The only surprising thing about this is that other states did not require changes in law. It's Good, Actually, that big companies are (sometimes) bound by the same laws that bind the rest of us.

          (That note also suggests they are still testing their cold-weather kit and are not quite ready.)

          1 - https://waymo.com/blog/shorts/back-to-boston/

      • They tried to roll out in New York City, but the city did not approve.

        https://www.twu.org/twu-tech-newsletter-waymo-no-mo-in-nyc-f...

        • I personally saw a Waymo in NYC on June 26th at 14th St and 8th Avenue, so they’ve done some recent testing at least.
    • They have been fully open here in Los Angeles for almost two years now.
    • It's easier to roll out in places where it seldom snows.
      • Definitely true, but snow affecting driving conditions is becoming pretty rare in cities like Chicago.
    • "Maybe it's something you've got that they haven't got." - Owen Kellogg
    • The anti-science slopulism of the far left is infecting blue states. Hopefully the liberal left can fight back to prevent the party being taken over like maga did to Republicans.
      • What “anti-science slopulism” are you referring to? And what does corporate rollout strategy have to do with science?
        • History of being anti-nuclear. Now against "AI" and self driving cars because they like trains.
    • Is it unfortunate, though?
  • Something to hold in mind are the issues with scaling out to new cities in terms of safety risks: https://junkoyoshidaparis.substack.com/p/rapid-scaling-turns...
  • Service area is still miniscule.
    • Gotta start somewhere. Still bigger than any competitor.
  • Waymo sells itself

    People hate human drivers more than they hate the idea of AI drivers

    https://www.nytimes.com/2026/08/04/business/uber-sexual-assa...

    • It’s an extremely consistent experience, and you can sit in the front seat (something I like personally). With Uber and taxi services, you never know what kind of driver or ride you’re going to get.
      • Uber is at least 1000x better than traditionally taxi, without any rating system.
        • They use to be (along with Lyft). But it's been a very long time since that was clearly true.

          In reality I think you can get better experiences than a taxi with a rideshare service (which they really aren't for a very long time), but it's very hit or miss.

          So less consistently bad as a taxi service... but far from consistently good.

    • The real test is, can these self-driving cars drive I-4 without getting into any sort of wreck?

      https://www.worldatlas.com/places/the-most-dangerous-highway...

  • I love Waymo. The only problem I have with it is that it further siphons wages from local economies into Silicon Valley, beyond what Uber/Lyft already did.
  • Dallas drivers are bad enough already...
  • ape4
    Anyone with a credit card
    • Debit card works just fine with Waymo, just like with Lyft and Uber.
    • I'm sure you can imagine why it might be unnecessarily complicated for a Waymo to take cash.
      • There are tons of automated systems which take cash. I do agree it would add some complexity to the equipment in the car, but its not like it would be that difficult to do it. I do agree though they don't bother because it probably would cost more to manage in the end than the amount of rides they're losing not accepting cash.
    • And presumably their app?, which requires either an Apple or Google account.
      • Uber app only requires an email address
    • [flagged]
      • Credit cards are not free money lmao
  • It does seem necessary to have cameras inside driverless cars but I don't want to if Google is running the show. Your biometrics will probably be stored for "enforcing Google's policies" at a minimum [1].

    And then a Waymo dropped teenagers off at the police? I don't care if that was a human, I don't want no snitch car service [2].

    [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49027861

    https://www.404media.co/waymo-called-police-on-teens-san-mat...

    • Unfortunately doing drive-bys is also a TOS violation for Uber and Lyft